Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Idea of reduce a waste time in a learning sequence. #4

Closed
usk-johnny-s opened this issue Feb 20, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Idea of reduce a waste time in a learning sequence. #4

usk-johnny-s opened this issue Feb 20, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@usk-johnny-s
Copy link

My understanding of current learning sequence is follows.

  1. INITIAL_RAMP with WHOLE_OVEN
  2. measuring CONSTANT with WHOLE_OVEN
  3. measureing CONSTANT with BOTTOM_ELEMENT
  4. measureing CONSTANT with TOP_ELEMENT
  5. measuring INERTIA with WHOLE_OVEN
  6. measuring Insulation while Cool-down
  7. Stabilize with WHOLE_OVEN
  8. measuring INERTIA with BOTTOM_ELEMENT
  9. Cool-down
  10. Stabilize with BOTTOM_ELEMENT
  11. measuring INERTIA with TOP_ELEMENT
  12. COOLING
  13. DONE

My idea is follows.

  1. INITIAL_RAMP with WHOLE_OVEN
  2. measuring CONSTANT with WHOLE_OVEN
  3. measuring INERTIA with WHOLE_OVEN
  4. measuring Insulation while Cool-down
  5. measureing CONSTANT with BOTTOM_ELEMENT
  6. measuring INERTIA with BOTTOM_ELEMENT
  7. Cool-down
  8. measureing CONSTANT with TOP_ELEMENT
  9. measuring INERTIA with TOP_ELEMENT
  10. COOLING
  11. DONE

It will reduce a waste time. (reduce a time of stabilizing after a measureing inertia.)

@engineertype
Copy link
Owner

You are right, and it could be better. V1.5 will reduce the learning time to 25 minutes, and the results will be more accurate and reproducible. It'll be out before the end of 2019. Thanks for the feedback, it is appreciated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants