-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NTRs for Dietary Reference Intake terms #16
Comments
@ddooley proposed classes were created in the pre-release version (ons-edit.owl) Keeping this open for further discussion, if there is nothing to add I'll close |
Hi, And here is a better URL for the document reference: |
Thanks! |
p.s. there are abbreviations and one example of usage that should be included too. |
Something I see in your ons-edit.owl file - it seems like you have merged the import files directly into it. Have you considered leaving the import files as separate files, which are linked in ons-edit.owl rather than merged in it? Then ons-edit.owl primarily holds ons terms and little else. |
Actually imports are not merged in the main file, rather they are automatically imported when opening ons.owl (or ons-edit.owl) as they are declared as imports in
In Protègè, in fact, you can remove the imports and loose annotations. Isn't that the expected behavior? |
Yes, just saw the "download as guest" simply asking for a mail. |
You should check ons-edit.owl because full FOODON terms do appear to be in that file. Same with ons.owl - that is why they are each above 4.2Mb. I see ons-edit.owl does have an imports/ontofox_import.owl file, but if you disconnect it I think you will still find lots of FOODON_12345678 terms fully defined in the main file. |
p.s. I just learned how to remove them automatically with a ROBOT command that takes out from the main file everything that is present in an import file, so can help with that part. |
Yes, some terms are for sure fully defined in main ons.owl
that was what I exactly searched for! You mean taking out entire class, or their annotations? that would be useful to also remove double annotation problem #15 |
This should work: robot convert --input imports/ontofox_import.owl --format ofn --output temp-import.ofn Check ons_edit_2.owl to see if that's ok (all classes which are described in import file are now removed from ons_edit_2.owl), and if so, rename it back to ons_edit.owl |
Cited the above comment on issue #15 which is dedicated to the problem of multiple annotations. The requested terms are now in |
This Is a request for a handful of standard Dietary Reference Intake terms, held in this Google Sheet ready for comment.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-_O51W78nPFCkvfBRufz-XEberdfldOTCbPMkEsUv4kg
Francesco you have edit permission on it. A preview of the terms is below:
I've linked this in for comment from the JFOW group.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: