Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[web] Document the need for yarn classic #745

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mnvr
Copy link
Member

@mnvr mnvr commented Mar 8, 2024

People often run into issues with yarn install because they're using a newer yarn. The situation is generally bad - we don't want to update to Yarn v4 yet because it is marked experimental and is not the default yarn that gets installed by node currently. We could add a packageManager field to our package.json, but this will only fail the build with a better (hopefully) error message, and will necessitate the user to corepack_enable.

I'm not sure what's the best approach right now to make the initial setup be seamless (I think we're using the approach that works for the maximum of all the alternatives, but I'm not sure). At least, let me add a note about it.

Ref:

@mnvr mnvr changed the title Document the need for yarn classic [web] Document the need for yarn classic Mar 8, 2024
@mnvr mnvr merged commit 00f3a0c into main Mar 8, 2024
2 checks passed
@mnvr mnvr deleted the document-yarn-classic branch March 8, 2024 07:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant