Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Cairo backend image draw test fails #1035

Open
corranwebster opened this issue Apr 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Cairo backend image draw test fails #1035

corranwebster opened this issue Apr 17, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@corranwebster
Copy link
Contributor

Doesn't draw anything it seems. Possibly an issue around image scaling.

Also looks like the image drawing may not be clean in the context's state.
corranwebster added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2023
@corranwebster
Expect Cairo drawing to fail -see #1035
9819033
@jwiggins
Copy link
Member

As with OpenGL, we could probably ditch the Cairo backend without anybody noticing...

@corranwebster corranwebster mentioned this issue Apr 18, 2023
Merged
corranwebster added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
@corranwebster
Fix CI (#1036)
1565976 
This gets a reasonable baseline CI working for Kiva and Enable.  It covers Python 3.8 and 3.10 with a reasonable set of Kiva backends and ETS toolkits.  It splits out the Linux Qt dependency installation into a separate action as is done in other ETS projects so it can be re-used across workflows.

There are a number of test cases skipped:

- WxPython on MacOS and Linux due to lack of appropriate wheels
- PyQt5 on Python 3.10 due to #1037
- PyQt5 on Windows due to #1038

This also adds a skip to a Cairo backend test case due to #1035 and a couple of drive-by fixes to the Cairo Kiva backend (Cairo was previously not being tested).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jwiggins @corranwebster