Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CLOSED] QUERCAM not listed for OT #73

Closed
envisionnw opened this issue Mar 21, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

[CLOSED] QUERCAM not listed for OT #73

envisionnw opened this issue Mar 21, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@envisionnw
Copy link
Owner

Issue by NCPN
Friday Apr 01, 2016 at 21:50 GMT
Originally opened as NCPN/upland#73


During the QA/QC session today, we realized that a requirement for the overstory census species pick list was overlooked. When overstory trees are measured in forest and woodland plots, Quercus gambelii (QUEGAM) is considered to be an overstory tree when the diameter is > 15 cm. However, QUEGAM is defined as a shrub in the plants table and is considered a shrub for all other measurements, so it is currently not included in the overstory pick list. So if you could look into how best to include QUEGAM in the overstory pick list, that would be great. Note that this should not be needed until they monitor forest and woodland plots, so this is not something we need to accommodate immediately.

The modification which limits the picklist to the Tree Lifeform was implemented for:
LP Seedling
OT Sapling
OT Census

QUEGAM is only needed in the OT census pick list.

And just to clarify my previous email, QUEGAM should display in the OT census pick list for all plot types. I mentioned forest and woodland plots in my previous message, but QUEGAM is also measured in oak plots, and it is my understanding that the crew will record trees if they find them on grassland plots.

@envisionnw
Copy link
Owner Author

Comment by NCPN
Friday Apr 01, 2016 at 22:20 GMT


Version 0.0.0.9027
2016 Pre-Season Updates
closes #70 as no repro, fixes #69, fixes #71, fixes #72
fixes #73 vs. #72

@envisionnw
Copy link
Owner Author

closed on Apr 1, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant