-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing another bug related to builds without Grackle #110
Conversation
ad01cf4
to
aae4793
Compare
Looks good so far! I'll approve it when you finish with the testing and change it from WIP. |
This attempt tries to build on the existing CI commands
41efba6
to
5ea73e4
Compare
…d a minor change that broke builds without Grackle
…e more descriptive
This is now ready for review. If there were ever a PR that should be squashed while merging, this would be the one. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. I only found a typo in the circleci description that needs addressing. We can then squash-n-merge!
@bwoshea approved in his comment but didn't hit the approve button. That's 2 approvals and I'm squashing and merging! |
PR #49 introduced a minor change that breaks builds without Grackle (again).
I've fixed this locally (it's a really easy fix). But I'm taking this as an opportunity to try to setup a CircleCi test to verify that Enzo-E can be built without Grackle (Our other tests already take a while, so I'm not going to run any tests with this build; I'm just checking if the build succeeds).
I'm intentionally going to make some tests fail while testing this, but this will be ready for review by tomorrow. (I'll change this from WIP once it's ready and I'll add an edit to this post confirming that it's ready).
EDIT: I'm done. This is now ready for review.