Compile Time Improvement: Isolate boost::filesystem as a depenendency of cello.cpp #320
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Out of curiosity, I was using clang's -ftime-trace flag to test profile where most of the compile time was being spent. Unsurprisingly, a lot of the time (maybe 30% - 50% per source file is spent reading in header files). A lot of this time is spent reading the
<charm++>
and C++ standard library headers. I hope to look at that in the future.Somewhat surprisingly, every source file was spending ~0.4 seconds just reading <boost/filesystem> (this may be a slight underestimate). Given that we have over 220 source files, that's about 80 seconds per build (in serial). For context, a serial build on my machine probably takes ~15 minutes (maybe more). This was not very rigorous, but it seemed like an easy win to slightly improve build times by a few percent.