You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It'd be nice if the comparative plot was limited to a maximum y axis value of 3 (similar to the other R plots). Guam has been throwing things off for the last several updates:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, thanks for flagging this. It looks like Guam has got slightly better over time and is no longer causing this. However, there does seem to be a general issue that reproduction number estimates are generally wider in places with fewer reported cases (even if this is as a result of their epidemic slowing down). We're going to be moving to a new model for estimating the reproduction number soon that we hope will iron out this problem (EpiNow2).
It'd be nice if the comparative plot was limited to a maximum y axis value of 3 (similar to the other R plots). Guam has been throwing things off for the last several updates:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: