We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It is more efficient to encode random walks using a cumulative sum formulation. There should be no downsides to this change.
This section of the code
https://github.com/epiforecasts/epinowcast/blob/38ab91013fe105935c11bf2f9c199a2fbf0c2110/inst/stan/epinowcast.stan#L131
needs to be updated to use the same approach as seen here.
https://github.com/epiforecasts/epinowcast/blob/a48ae0a9ee0652d8b1ffbf6220484ec9c1de2114/inst/stan/epinowcast.stan#L141
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
0.1.0
Done in #103
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
It is more efficient to encode random walks using a cumulative sum formulation. There should be no downsides to this change.
This section of the code
https://github.com/epiforecasts/epinowcast/blob/38ab91013fe105935c11bf2f9c199a2fbf0c2110/inst/stan/epinowcast.stan#L131
needs to be updated to use the same approach as seen here.
https://github.com/epiforecasts/epinowcast/blob/a48ae0a9ee0652d8b1ffbf6220484ec9c1de2114/inst/stan/epinowcast.stan#L141
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: