You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the configuration files are designed as optuna-compatible functions, but this adds boilerplate (such as f"_{name}".) And maybe confusing and hard to understand.
It would help with clarity if we can have a different format that still supports the features of the optuna suggestions and types, but is easier to read and write.
This may also make it easier to set random states for reproducibility #53
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
perib
changed the title
is it possible to simplify user facing optuna functions that generate the hyperparameters? Would be good if the users didn't have to include f"_{name}".
Can we improve the configuration files to be easier to read and write?
Oct 5, 2023
Currently, the configuration files are designed as optuna-compatible functions, but this adds boilerplate (such as f"_{name}".) And maybe confusing and hard to understand.
It would help with clarity if we can have a different format that still supports the features of the optuna suggestions and types, but is easier to read and write.
This may also make it easier to set random states for reproducibility #53
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: