Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we improve the configuration files to be easier to read and write? #78

Open
perib opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
API question Further information is requested

Comments

@perib
Copy link
Collaborator

perib commented Sep 28, 2023

Currently, the configuration files are designed as optuna-compatible functions, but this adds boilerplate (such as f"_{name}".) And maybe confusing and hard to understand.

It would help with clarity if we can have a different format that still supports the features of the optuna suggestions and types, but is easier to read and write.

This may also make it easier to set random states for reproducibility #53

@jay-m-dev jay-m-dev added question Further information is requested API labels Sep 29, 2023
@perib perib mentioned this issue Oct 5, 2023
@perib perib changed the title is it possible to simplify user facing optuna functions that generate the hyperparameters? Would be good if the users didn't have to include f"_{name}". Can we improve the configuration files to be easier to read and write? Oct 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants