generated from epiverse-trace/packagetemplate
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-parameterise contact interval as infectious period? #61
Comments
Implementing this now. One note, the contacts that are not infected are still sampled as being contacts within the infectious period. I will document this in the package so users are aware. |
joshwlambert
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2024
joshwlambert
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2024
joshwlambert
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2024
joshwlambert
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2024
joshwlambert
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 5, 2024
joshwlambert
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 5, 2024
joshwlambert
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I stumbled a bit on 'contact interval' (initially thought it was duration of contact for a specific contact). But then realised it's the temporal gap between contacts?
I think perhaps a more intuitive parameterisation would be to define an infectious period for the case, then distribute the times of infections among their contacts according to this distribution (like the implementation here), rather than relative to the time of interaction with the last contact (which I how I understand current approach works)?
Originally posted by @adamkucharski in #60 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: