Test tracker progress

[Blunde1]

Issue
Resolves #3111
Resolves #3092 which was wrong, but correctly points out that a test for _progress() is needed in EvaluatorTracker

Approach
Modify test_tracking_progress() with the following:

PartialSnapshots allow realizations to progress, while iterating "iter" in
CloudEvents allows phases to progress. Such progress should happen
when events are yielded by the tracker. This combined progress is tested.

Pre review checklist

• Added appropriate labels

Adding labels helps the maintainers when writing release notes, see sections and the
corresponding labels here: https://github.com/equinor/ert/blob/main/.github/release.yml

[ertomatic]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[sondreso]

Jenkins add to whitelist

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3110 (4d868ba) into main (7d0254f) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3110      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.44%   65.43%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         653      653              
  Lines       50831    50831              
  Branches     4475     4475              
==========================================
- Hits        33268    33259       -9     
- Misses      16050    16058       +8     
- Partials     1513     1514       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
ert_gui/ertwidgets/validationsupport.py	86.30% <0.00%> (-12.33%)	⬇️
libres/lib/res_util/block_fs.cpp	53.38% <0.00%> (-0.15%)	⬇️
ert/data/record/_transformation.py	88.72% <0.00%> (+0.49%)	⬆️

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

[jondequinor]

@Blunde1 what was the source of the original issue? Could you give some more detail?

[Blunde1]

@Blunde1 what was the source of the original issue? Could you give some more detail?

@jondequinor can you specify what you mean by "source"?
See comments in old issue #3092 and new issue #3111, and updated initial comment here. This will hopefully clarify the progress of this PR.

[jondequinor]

@jondequinor can you specify what you mean by "source"?

You explained it well! Thanks