Move test_stop_running into test_job_queue

[dafeda]

Pre review checklist

• Added appropriate release note label
• PR title captures the intent of the changes, and is fitting for release notes.
• Commit history is consistent and clean, in line with the contribution guidelines.

Adding labels helps the maintainers when writing release notes. This is the list of release note labels.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3709 (b5c15bb) into main (0079c8e) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3709      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.34%   63.33%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         597      597              
  Lines       46243    46243              
  Branches     4144     4144              
==========================================
- Hits        29293    29288       -5     
- Misses      15662    15666       +4     
- Partials     1288     1289       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/res/job_queue/forward_model_status.py	88.60% <0.00%> (-5.07%)	⬇️
src/libres/lib/res_util/block_fs.cpp	67.34% <0.00%> (-0.41%)	⬇️

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

[oyvindeide]

This might be a better assert:

Suggested change

	for i in range(5):
	assert job_list[i].status == JobStatusType.JOB_QUEUE_DONE
	assert queue.snapshot()[i] == str(JobStatusType.JOB_QUEUE_DONE)
	for i in range(5, 8):
	assert job_list[i].status == JobStatusType.JOB_QUEUE_FAILED
	assert queue.snapshot()[i] == str(JobStatusType.JOB_QUEUE_FAILED)
	for i in range(8, 10):
	assert job_list[i].status == JobStatusType.JOB_QUEUE_RUNNING
	assert queue.snapshot()[i] == str(JobStatusType.JOB_QUEUE_RUNNING)
	result = [(job.status, item) for (job, item) in zip(job_list, queue.snapshot())]
	assert result == [
	(JobStatusType(name="JOB_QUEUE_DONE", value=32), 0),
	(JobStatusType(name="JOB_QUEUE_DONE", value=32), 1),
	(JobStatusType(name="JOB_QUEUE_DONE", value=32), 2),
	(JobStatusType(name="JOB_QUEUE_DONE", value=32), 3),
	(JobStatusType(name="JOB_QUEUE_DONE", value=32), 4),
	(JobStatusType(name="JOB_QUEUE_FAILED", value=8192), 5),
	(JobStatusType(name="JOB_QUEUE_FAILED", value=8192), 6),
	(JobStatusType(name="JOB_QUEUE_FAILED", value=8192), 7),
	(JobStatusType(name="JOB_QUEUE_RUNNING", value=16), 8),
	(JobStatusType(name="JOB_QUEUE_RUNNING", value=16), 9),
	]

know you are only moving this code, so do it if you agree. The advantage is one assert instead of many, so the feedback on failure is hopefully better.