Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Change how the Explorer handles PIT #254

Open
equinor-ruaj opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Change how the Explorer handles PIT #254

equinor-ruaj opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@rwiker

Comments

@equinor-ruaj
Copy link
Contributor

From discussion in refinement 06.11.2023 started from #253

  • Should the Explorer handle PITs differently?
  • Should for example users specify with PIT as...
  • What about cases where user creates a PIT, but does not do all requests within the PIT lifetime? Should we have methods that handle everything under the hood? e.g. user wants to iterate over many objects. Currently we create a pit that is used automatically when the user iterates. This might give issues if there is a significant (PIT keep_alive) time between iterations. Is it a solution that we load everything behind the scenes?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rwiker rwiker

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rwiker @equinor-ruaj