Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Subcommands could use an overhaul #93

Closed
wycats opened this issue Nov 28, 2010 · 3 comments
Closed

Subcommands could use an overhaul #93

wycats opened this issue Nov 28, 2010 · 3 comments

Comments

@wycats
Copy link
Member

wycats commented Nov 28, 2010

Currently, subcommands are mostly tacked on and could use some proper thinking behind them.

@indirect
Copy link
Member

That would be me :P IMO, the entire #invoke structure needs to be reworked in a way that makes thor commands modular and extensible. At that point, implementing subcommands in a non-crazy way should be relatively trivial. Heh.

@carllerche
Copy link

They don't work with Thor::Group at all

@aiwilliams
Copy link

So, I've wasted a good deal of my time today trying to make subcommands, with useful help output, work with v0.14.6. Is there any hope for the near future? I'd love to say I could dig in and fix something, but I've only been with the thing for a few hours now.

@rails rails locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 15, 2023
@rafaelfranca rafaelfranca converted this issue into discussion #843 May 15, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants