Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

babel-eslint@4.1.6 breaks build 🚨 #66

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello πŸ‘‹

🚨🚨🚨

babel-eslint just published its new version 4.1.6, which is covered by your current version range. After updating it in your project the build went from success to failure.

This means your software is now malfunctioning, because of this update. Use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 17 commits .

  • 7448831 4.1.6
  • 6266b00 skip for now
  • 51ba593 add node 5
  • 8269290 test for no-redeclare
  • c53a492 Merge pull request #212 from evocateur/fix-with-latest-eslint
  • 0d8953d Avoid errors in eslint 1.10.x when excluding destructured properties.
  • 0af8736 Merge pull request #209 from Constellation/pattern-visitor
  • ba7e1b6 Patch SpreadProperty to escope's PatternVisitor
  • 52d1c84 mention eslint-plugin-flow-vars for flow issues
  • fba0a49 4.1.5
  • 6a4a80e Merge pull request #206 from mysticatea/fix-for-eslint-1.9
  • 8c45795 fix for npm@3 and eslint@1.9
  • 9295bba 4.1.4
  • a10f083 update eslint, acorn-to-esprima
  • d2e3862 test with ecmaFeatures on by default, add test for #192

There are 17 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚑

@erikras erikras closed this Jan 11, 2016
@yesmeck yesmeck deleted the greenkeeper-babel-eslint-4.1.6 branch July 2, 2016 16:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants