-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ssl: Add brainpool for TLS-1.3 #8056
ssl: Add brainpool for TLS-1.3 #8056
Conversation
CT Test Results 2 files 67 suites 48m 20s ⏱️ Results for commit 6801f0f. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. To speed up review, make sure that you have read Contributing to Erlang/OTP and that all checks pass. See the TESTING and DEVELOPMENT HowTo guides for details about how to run test locally. Artifacts// Erlang/OTP Github Action Bot |
74250ef
to
84bbf7c
Compare
84bbf7c
to
7b706ab
Compare
7b706ab
to
9991bd2
Compare
9991bd2
to
f3dc225
Compare
f3dc225
to
20ab762
Compare
I think the strongest argument for deprecating prf, is that it is confusing in many ways for the user. It has legacy name that most people do not understand. It has confusing arguments that can fool you into using something that does not fulfill exporter guarantees. SSL/TLS is hard enough without these sources of confusion. |
I will redo this when #8169 has been merged. Maybe we can keep ecc function with new doc and not document ec_curves. |
9ab3699
to
fcf74f4
Compare
8e232ff
to
d2ba738
Compare
Also fix eccs documentation in markdown (patched in OTP-26 after conversion)
d2ba738
to
6801f0f
Compare
Add support brainpool elliptic curves in TLS-1.3