fixes #58: upgrade client dependency

[dcrissman]

No description provided.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 60.584% when pulling cef1e6a on dcrissman:clientUpgrade into 151d887 on esbtools:master.

[alechenninger]

We want to use the most top level, but still relevant type here, as in, what the client accepts for data(..) calls. So, I think we should be using LightblueDataRequest instead of CRUDRequest for this type (and everywhere else this occurs).

[dcrissman]

I am looking to see if I can use LightblueDataRequest anywhere, but CRUDRequest has the getOperation method which is required in DataBulkRequest.

[dcrissman]

You cannot use DataBulkRequest with anything other than a CRUDRequest, and bulk operations appear to be what the EventHandler users.

That said, the below interfaces could each be altered to take a generic that extends LightblueDataRequest. Then BulkLightblueRequester could just use CRUDRequest. We could go an extra step and create interface helpers for CRUDRequest. See example below.

Honestly, it seems a bit much to me as BulkLightblueRequester is currently the only implementation of LightblueRequester.

• LightblueDataResponses
• LightblueRequester
• LightblueResponses

Example

public interface LightblueRequester<T extends LightblueDataRequest> extends Requester<T, LightblueDataResponse> { ... }

public interface LightblueCrudRequester extends LightblueRequester<CRUDRequest> {}

[alechenninger]

I think it's fine with CRUDRequest, I didn't realize it was required for bulk requests. There is already a generic Requester interface in case another type is needed.

[alechenninger]

LGTM! Thanks!