Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

prefer-const rule should treat ForInStatement with the same way as ForOfStatement. #2739

Closed
mysticatea opened this issue Jun 10, 2015 · 0 comments · Fixed by DavidKindler/meteor#3
Closed

prefer-const rule should treat ForInStatement with the same way as ForOfStatement. #2739

mysticatea opened this issue Jun 10, 2015 · 0 comments · Fixed by DavidKindler/meteor#3
Labels
accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion enhancement This change enhances an existing feature of ESLint rule Relates to ESLint's core rules

Comments

@mysticatea
Copy link
Member

This detail is here
for-in are considered warnings that the same as for-of.
@nzakas nzakas added enhancement This change enhances an existing feature of ESLint rule Relates to ESLint's core rules accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion labels Jun 10, 2015
@nzakas nzakas closed this as completed in 4f53c63 Jun 10, 2015
nzakas added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 10, 2015
@nzakas
Merge pull request #2740 from mysticatea/fix-prefer-const
da416e7 
Fix: `prefer-const` treats `for-in`/`for-of` with the same way (Fixes #2739)
@hax hax mentioned this issue Nov 13, 2015
Closed
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 7, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 7, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion enhancement This change enhances an existing feature of ESLint rule Relates to ESLint's core rules
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[Snyk] Upgrade eslint from 0.22.1 to 0.24.1 DavidKindler/meteor
2 participants
@nzakas @mysticatea