Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: func-name-matching: update with “always”/“never” option #7536

Merged

Conversation

ljharb
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

@ljharb ljharb commented Nov 4, 2016

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[x] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofixing to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:

Followup from #7428.

@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@mention-bot
Copy link

@ljharb, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @azhang496, @nzakas and @ilyavolodin to be potential reviewers.

Copy link
Member

@kaicataldo kaicataldo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks! I'll update the blog post too.

@kaicataldo kaicataldo merged commit a838b8e into eslint:master Nov 5, 2016
@ljharb ljharb deleted the ljharb/fix_func_name_matching_docs branch November 5, 2016 04:13
kaicataldo added a commit to eslint/archive-website that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2016
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants