Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Update semantic versioning policy #6935

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 21, 2016
Merged

Docs: Update semantic versioning policy #6935

merged 1 commit into from Aug 21, 2016

Conversation

alberto
Copy link
Member

@alberto alberto commented Aug 18, 2016

Updated per TSC meeting 2016-08-18.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@alberto, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the annotation information on this pull request, we identified @nzakas, @platinumazure and @yoshuawuyts to be potential reviewers

@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@@ -155,13 +155,14 @@ ESLint follows [semantic versioning](http://semver.org). However, due to the nat
* Minor release (might break your lint build)
* A bug fix in a rule that results in ESLint reporting more errors.
* A new rule is created.
* A new option to an existing rule is created.
* A new option to an existing rule is created, not reporting more errors.
Copy link
Member

@nzakas nzakas Aug 19, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's clean up the language here:

A new option to an existing rule that does not result in ESLint reporting more errors by default

@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@nzakas
Copy link
Member

nzakas commented Aug 21, 2016

Lgtm

@nzakas nzakas merged commit 6a92be5 into master Aug 21, 2016
@alberto alberto deleted the docs-semver branch October 21, 2016 16:10
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants