Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Log start of i2c setup #5049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 4, 2023
Merged

Log start of i2c setup #5049

merged 1 commit into from Jul 4, 2023

Conversation

jesserockz
Copy link
Member

What does this implement/fix?

Types of changes

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Other

Related issue or feature (if applicable): fixes

Pull request in esphome-docs with documentation (if applicable): esphome/esphome-docs#

Test Environment

  • ESP32
  • ESP32 IDF
  • ESP8266
  • RP2040

Example entry for config.yaml:

# Example config.yaml

Checklist:

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works (under tests/ folder).

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

@probot-esphome
Copy link

probot-esphome bot commented Jul 4, 2023

Hey there @esphome/core, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (i2c) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
(message by CodeOwnersMention)

@jesserockz jesserockz changed the title Log start if i2c setup Log start of i2c setup Jul 4, 2023
@jesserockz jesserockz merged commit 45c72f1 into dev Jul 4, 2023
25 checks passed
@jesserockz jesserockz deleted the jesserockz-2023-252 branch July 4, 2023 03:26
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant