Fix RMT timing clock base

[majkrzak]

What does this implement/fix?

RMT on ESP32 is no longer clocked with the ABP clock, which value were used in the esp32_rmt_led_strip component. In recent C6 (and probably couple previous) PLL_F80M_CLK 80 MHz clocks used, while earlier ABP_CLK was used, which is stated to be always 80 MHz for that case also, as stated in Tehnical Reference Manuals.

This cause wrong timings in esp32_rmt_led_strip for chips like ESP32 C6 and most likely P4, H2, C5 and sometimes C2.

To fix it, I suggest adding a constant missing from esp-idf framework, and using it istead.

Types of changes

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Other

Related issue or feature (if applicable): fixes

Pull request in esphome-docs with documentation (if applicable): esphome/esphome-docs#

Test Environment

• ESP32
• ESP32 IDF
• ESP8266
• RP2040
• BK72xx
• RTL87xx

Example entry for config.yaml:

# Example config.yaml

Checklist:

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works (under tests/ folder).

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated in esphome-docs.

References

• Fix APB_CLK_FREQ value for C6 (IDFGH-11886) espressif/esp-idf#12972

[probot-esphome]

Hey there @jesserockz, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (esp32_rmt_led_strip) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d551a2e) 53.60% compared to head (6c15dc3) 53.68%.
Report is 10 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #6101      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.60%   53.68%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          50       50              
  Lines        9374     9385      +11     
  Branches     1650     1651       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         5025     5038      +13     
+ Misses       4050     4049       -1     
+ Partials      299      298       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.