-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tedx_spanish_corpus egs2 recipe #4523
Conversation
This pull request is now in conflict :( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Many thanks for your contribution. I guess you are using the wrong version of black to format the codebase, resulting in many changes to other parts. Could you try to revert the changes to those, otherwise you may not pass CI tests for the formating. Also, I have some minor suggestions as follows:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have some comments.
Why some files that are not related to this PR are changed? |
This pull request is now in conflict :( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please fix the conflict~ A minor issue is as follows:
# create train, dev, test split 90/5/5 | ||
# python local/split_data.py |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The line is commented out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should I release the code for the way the data was split? this is where it sits; but we don't run it after the initial split which is now uploaded in a separate repo
I am currently running black on 22.6.0, is this the correct version? |
I found that
Also, please fix the conflict. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4523 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 82.52% 82.52%
=======================================
Files 487 487
Lines 42024 42024
=======================================
+ Hits 34680 34681 +1
+ Misses 7344 7343 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more |
PR for TEDx Spanish Corpus (https://www.openslr.org/67/)