Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Change ESP_ERR_CHECK to ESP_ERROR_CHECK in provisioning examples (IDFGH-5222) #6995

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

alexhenrie
Copy link
Contributor

Closes IDFGH-5221 (#6994)

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented May 6, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@espressif-bot espressif-bot added the Status: Opened Issue is new label May 6, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title docs: Change ESP_ERR_CHECK to ESP_ERROR_CHECK in provisioning examples docs: Change ESP_ERR_CHECK to ESP_ERROR_CHECK in provisioning examples (IDFGH-5222) May 6, 2021
@Alvin1Zhang
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your contribution.

@mahavirj mahavirj self-requested a review May 9, 2021 10:34
@espressif-bot espressif-bot added Status: In Progress Work is in progress and removed Status: Opened Issue is new labels May 9, 2021
@Alvin1Zhang
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexhenrie Thanks for your contribution, and sorry for late reply, we have put the changes into our internal review queue, and the PR will be updated once the changes are available on GitHub. Thanks.

@espressif-bot espressif-bot added Status: Done Issue is done internally Resolution: Done Issue is done internally and removed Status: In Progress Work is in progress labels May 11, 2021
@alexhenrie
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you!

@alexhenrie alexhenrie deleted the err_check branch June 9, 2021 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Resolution: Done Issue is done internally Status: Done Issue is done internally
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants