Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CNVkit on WGBS data #809

Open
QLZhouBio opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

CNVkit on WGBS data #809

QLZhouBio opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@QLZhouBio
Copy link

Hi, I have some WGBS data and would like to check the copy number variant in these data. However, I am not sure whether CNVkit is suitable for WGBS data since the methylated C is converted to T in WGBS data. Will that affect the CG content hence affects the rolling median steps?

@kenji-yt
Copy link

kenji-yt commented Jun 4, 2024

@QLZhouBio I am pretty sure bisulfite conversion affects the relationship between GC content and coverage. This is because un-methylated regions will have very low GC content after conversion (1/2 original GC content if all C->T on both strands). I believe that reads will therefore be amplified by PCR according to their GC content post bisulfite conversion. Since PCR is the main source of GC bias (Speed and Benjamini 2012) it will affect coverage. For example in some of my own WGBS data there is no relationship between GC content and coverage. Normalization is therefore ineffective. The package ReadDepth accounts for this. They take the effective GC content of the bin by considering methylation status of each cytosine site.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants