Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AA-128 L-09: document getBlsPublicKey #199

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

drortirosh
Copy link
Contributor

remove confusing reference to non-existent (and non-standard) method getAggregationInfo()
give "getBlsPublicKey" as an example.

remove confusing reference to non-existent (and non-standard) method
getAggregationInfo()
give "getBlsPublicKey" as an example.
@@ -145,9 +145,10 @@ interface IAggregatedAccount is IAccount {

* **getAggregator()** returns the aggregator this account supports.
* **validateUserOp()** (inherited from IAccount interface) MUST verify the `aggregator` parameter is valid and the same as `getAggregator`
* The account should also support aggregator-specific getter (e.g. `getAggregationInfo()`).
* The account should also support aggregator-specific getter.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe this is better left out of the ERC, like the aggregator and the account interaction is not restricted by this ERC. The account may need to support aggregator-specific view functions. or something along this line?

add missing require message.
Note that account's addDeposit() now calls the paymaster's depositTo()
explicitly, instead of relying on the EntryPoint's receive() fallback
method.
@shahafn shahafn merged commit 12d2ac0 into develop Feb 8, 2023
@shahafn shahafn deleted the L09-doc-getBlsPubKey branch February 8, 2023 21:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants