Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Call for Input: how should we decide whether a PR updating author list of a Final EIP/ERC/RIP be merged or rejected? #329

Closed
xinbenlv opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@xinbenlv
Copy link

xinbenlv commented Mar 29, 2024

Call for Input

Decision: How should we decide whether a PR updating author list of a Final EIP/ERC/RIP be merged or rejected?

  • Option 1: approve at editor discretion
  • Option 2: approve at editor consensus
  • Option 3: approve by lead author or author consensus
  • Option 4: other, please suggest

Method: Rough Consensus
Deadline: April 29th, 2024

Background

#325 (comment)

@xinbenlv xinbenlv changed the title Call for Input: create a policy for updating author list? Call for Input: how should we decide whether a PR updating author list of a Final EIP/ERC/RIP be merged or rejected? Mar 29, 2024
@SamWilsn
Copy link
Collaborator

SamWilsn commented Apr 2, 2024

I don't think modifying a final proposal should be any different than any other potentially contentious decision: open a rough consensus call for input.

@poojaranjan poojaranjan mentioned this issue Apr 10, 2024
16 tasks
@g11tech
Copy link

g11tech commented Apr 10, 2024

simple reject call for input as well

@SamWilsn
Copy link
Collaborator

@xinbenlv's preferred option is 3 I think?

@xinbenlv
Copy link
Author

xinbenlv commented Apr 10, 2024

I recognize @g11tech and @SamWilsn 's preferences to use call for input. While I reserve my preference, I am ok with proceed with majority view.

@poojaranjan poojaranjan mentioned this issue Apr 11, 2024
19 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants