Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIPIP Meeting 43 Agenda #90

Closed
poojaranjan opened this issue Oct 28, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

EIPIP Meeting 43 Agenda #90

poojaranjan opened this issue Oct 28, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member

poojaranjan commented Oct 28, 2021

Date and Time

Wednesday, Nov 03, 2021, at 15:00 UTC

Location

Zoom: TBA in the Discord #eip-editing channel

YouTube Live Stream/Recording: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4cwHXAawZxpLrRIkDlBjDUUrGgF91pQw

Agenda

1. Rename review-period-end to last-call-end or last-call-deadline. Ref: Issue

2. Discuss qualifications for being on the Active Editors list. Ref: Comment

3. Discuss Registry EIPs and what to call them: ethereum/EIPs#4335 Ref: Comment

4. Agree on who gets mentioned in EIPs: ethereum/EIPs#4390 Ref: Comment

5. EIP file name error problem for new submission Ref: Issue

6. EIPs Insight - Monthly EIPs status reporting.

7. Review action items from the previous meetings

  • EIP GitHub access to Lightclient

(Anything else, please add a comment)

@MicahZoltu
Copy link

Discuss qualifications for being on the Active Editors list.

@MicahZoltu
Copy link

MicahZoltu commented Oct 29, 2021

Discuss Registry EIPs and what to call them: ethereum/EIPs#4335

@MicahZoltu
Copy link

Agree on who gets mentioned in EIPs: ethereum/EIPs#4390

@MicahZoltu
Copy link

Explanation from Micah on why he is such a dick about everyone following the process and no one getting special treatment or allowing certain things to bypass the rules.

I think it would be good to get this on record more formally, rather than in the individual comments I leave as PR feedback everywhere. I have been getting into conflict with many people on this topic lately.

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #91

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants