Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ctb): Subgame rez changes #10148

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Apr 15, 2024
Merged

feat(ctb): Subgame rez changes #10148

merged 11 commits into from Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

clabby
Copy link
Member

@clabby clabby commented Apr 15, 2024

Overview

Changes subgame resolution to track in-order resolution and re-use the clock logic from move to reduce duplication.

Metadata
closes https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/client-pod/issues/727

@clabby clabby requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2024 15:04
@clabby clabby requested a review from tynes April 15, 2024 15:04
@clabby clabby self-assigned this Apr 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates aim to improve dispute resolution mechanisms within the Bedrock contracts. These changes refine subgame resolution logic, manage challenger durations, and optimize bond distribution. Unit tests now feature enhanced timing logic to accurately simulate diverse game scenarios, ensuring the robustness of the game logic.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../FaultDisputeGame.sol Added internal mapping for resolved subgames, updated semantic version constant, adjusted clock duration calculations, and modified subgame resolution.
.../FaultDisputeGame.t.sol Adjusted timing logic in unit tests for resolving claims by modifying time calculations to simulate different game scenarios accurately.

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34ce96a and 4492e46.
Files ignored due to path filters (7)
  • op-bindings/bindings/faultdisputegame.go is excluded by !op-bindings/bindings/**
  • op-bindings/bindings/faultdisputegame_more.go is excluded by !op-bindings/bindings/**
  • packages/contracts-bedrock/semver-lock.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/contracts-bedrock/snapshots/abi/FaultDisputeGame.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/contracts-bedrock/snapshots/abi/PermissionedDisputeGame.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/contracts-bedrock/snapshots/storageLayout/FaultDisputeGame.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • packages/contracts-bedrock/snapshots/storageLayout/PermissionedDisputeGame.json is excluded by !**/*.json
Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/contracts-bedrock/src/dispute/FaultDisputeGame.sol (10 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-bedrock/test/dispute/FaultDisputeGame.t.sol (19 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • packages/contracts-bedrock/src/dispute/FaultDisputeGame.sol
  • packages/contracts-bedrock/test/dispute/FaultDisputeGame.t.sol

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@clabby clabby requested review from Inphi and removed request for tynes April 15, 2024 15:23
Copy link
Contributor

@refcell refcell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything looks consistent ✅

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 29.22%. Comparing base (34ce96a) to head (d650e7b).

❗ Current head d650e7b differs from pull request most recent head 4492e46. Consider uploading reports for the commit 4492e46 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop   #10148       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage    42.40%   29.22%   -13.18%     
============================================
  Files           73       31       -42     
  Lines         4830     2898     -1932     
  Branches       766      614      -152     
============================================
- Hits          2048      847     -1201     
+ Misses        2676     1976      -700     
+ Partials       106       75       -31     
Flag Coverage Δ
cannon-go-tests ?
chain-mon-tests 27.14% <ø> (ø)
common-ts-tests ?
contracts-ts-tests 12.25% <ø> (ø)
core-utils-tests ?
sdk-tests 40.27% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 42 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@Inphi Inphi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants