Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ERC-5521: Move to Last Call #309

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
May 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

OniReimu
Copy link
Contributor

@OniReimu OniReimu commented Mar 11, 2024

Discussion on https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-5521-erc-721-referable-nft/10310.

Updated on 17 Apr: The method createdTimestampOf has been added to the interface to specifically emphasize the necessity of setting the createdTimestamp for each rNFT. This addition is not about implementation details but is a part of the specification.

Updated on 23 Apr: Fixed the grammar errors and typos.

@eip-review-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eip-review-bot commented Mar 11, 2024

✅ All reviewers have approved.

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot changed the title Update ERC-5521: Move to Last Call Update ERC-5521: Move to Last Call Mar 11, 2024
Copy link

The commit 3525d94 (as a parent of 7a5255f) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Mar 11, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@SamWilsn SamWilsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great overall! My only complaint is that your rationale section doesn't really explain choices you made within the proposal itself. Instead, you're justifying the EIP as a whole.

The rationale section should explain why, for example, UpdateNode indexes some of its arguments and not all of them.

My analogy for the difference between Motivation and Rationale is:

Motivation: Why do we need to build a shed?
Rationale: Why did I paint the shed red?

@OniReimu OniReimu requested a review from SamWilsn April 3, 2024 22:32
Copy link
Collaborator

@SamWilsn SamWilsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

aggreement -> agreement

ERCS/erc-5521.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-5521.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-5521.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-5521.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@OniReimu
Copy link
Contributor Author

OniReimu commented Apr 23, 2024

aggreement -> agreement

Thanks for that @SamWilsn

We've fixed this and more grammar errors and typos.

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) May 24, 2024 21:02
Copy link
Collaborator

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

Copy link
Collaborator

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot merged commit 9e45cf1 into ethereum:master May 24, 2024
10 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants