You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the desired behaviour if two beacon chain forks A and B do not advance justification for 4+ months, and then fork A (e.g. thanks to inactivity penalties) wins the race to justify first? We probably do not want fork B to honour the new justification in fork A.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think clients should just refuse to revert further than some maximum revert period, though now that we're dynamically calculating that, it should be dynamically calculated....
I'd say one important first thing to do is to add the explicit criterion that a client does not revert finalized blocks.
JustinDrake
changed the title
Enshrine weak subjectivity threshold in fork choice rule
Specify maximum revert period
Feb 7, 2019
What is the desired behaviour if two beacon chain forks A and B do not advance justification for 4+ months, and then fork A (e.g. thanks to inactivity penalties) wins the race to justify first? We probably do not want fork B to honour the new justification in fork A.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: