Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove interop from p2p spec #1767

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 30, 2020
Merged

Remove interop from p2p spec #1767

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 30, 2020

Conversation

djrtwo
Copy link
Contributor

@djrtwo djrtwo commented Apr 27, 2020

Remove interop from p2p spec. Make a few clarifications as needed

@djrtwo djrtwo requested a review from protolambda April 27, 2020 23:43
protolambda
protolambda approved these changes Apr 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@protolambda protolambda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 Nice cleanup, time for mainnet testing. Still expect additions to the network spec, but at least clients can focus on mainnet specs without legacy interop-testing requirements now.

@djrtwo djrtwo merged commit 070056b into v012x Apr 30, 2020
@djrtwo djrtwo deleted the remove-interop-fix branch April 30, 2020 17:05
@hwwhww hwwhww added this to the v0.12.0 milestone May 7, 2020
@terencechain terencechain mentioned this pull request May 20, 2020
Closed
25 tasks
@paulhauner paulhauner mentioned this pull request May 21, 2020
Closed
22 tasks
@ColinSchwarz ColinSchwarz mentioned this pull request May 25, 2020
Closed
@pawanjay176 pawanjay176 mentioned this pull request May 29, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@protolambda protolambda protolambda approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.12.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@djrtwo @protolambda @hwwhww