Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
this commit removes a section of the footer as we have received a vol…
…untary enquiry from a state authority that included a requirement for confidentiality
- Loading branch information
1 parent
4cd69db
commit 769b306
Showing
2 changed files
with
13 additions
and
66 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
769b306
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
这太扯淡了!不过这篓子是coindesk扯出来的!还有一个亚当出来解释,不够客观,亲自来看看。
769b306
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Worth noting that "...a voluntary enquiry from a state authority that included a requirement for confidentiality" and being "...contacted by any agency anywhere in the world in a way which requires that contact not to be disclosed" are very different. The latter can be a subset of the former, but the former could be anything innocuous like something in regular business operations.
Whereas an order where you're not even allowed to talk about the existence of the order is very different. Such an order would be violated by the commit text -- if the gagged order was the only order that the Foundation has ever received -- so the removal text and the removal could be referring to different things here.
Canaries can only die once, why waste it if you disclose it in the text anyway?
769b306
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Exactly! They are not going to "waste" their canary if it was a simple request for information. Best guess, this is the beginning of the end for Ethereum and they have been compromised just like Blockstream and BitcoinCore were previously.
It is best to assume that from now on Ethereum is no long a decentralized application but its development is being directed by a governmental agency, again, same at BitcoinCore.
769b306
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nah
769b306
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I hope that authorities are investigating my Genesis Sale ETH purchase. It's a shame that for years the Ethereum Foundation leadership was unwilling to have a good-faith discussion with me about the 175.29 ETH I paid for (but got 0 ETH instead).
ethereum/genesis_block_generator#21
769b306
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"Same at BitcoinCore"? I have to disagree. I have never heard of any intelligence agencies contacting the Bitcoin github organization.
769b306
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
who keeps deleting my comment...
https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=6652.0