Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typos in glossary terms #12430

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2024
Merged

Fix typos in glossary terms #12430

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

pettinarip
Copy link
Member

@pettinarip pettinarip commented Mar 12, 2024

Description

Fixes typos in glossary term keys and changes others that don't exist anymore.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected hyperlinks related to the 51% attack scenario in the context of Ethereum's proof-of-stake mechanism across various translations (Catalan, Indonesian, Dutch, and Romanian). This ensures accurate and reliable information dissemination and enhances user understanding of blockchain security concepts.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The overall change addresses the correction of hyperlinks in various language translations of a document related to energy consumption. These modifications specifically target the correction of links that reference a 51% attack scenario within the context of Ethereum's proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanism. The aim is to ensure that these references are accurate and direct users to the correct information regarding potential attack vulnerabilities in Ethereum's blockchain security.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../ca/energy-consumption/index.md Corrected hyperlink to 51% attack in Ethereum's PoS mechanism.
.../id/energy-consumption/index.md Corrected hyperlink to 51% attack in Ethereum's PoS mechanism.
.../nl/energy-consumption/index.md Corrected hyperlink related to 51% attack in Ethereum's PoS vs. PoW context.
.../ro/energy-consumption/index.md Corrected hyperlink to glossary term "51% attack" in Ethereum's PoS mechanism context.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@github-actions github-actions bot added content 🖋️ This involves copy additions or edits review needed 👀 translation 🌍 This is related to our Translation Program labels Mar 12, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 12, 2024

Deploy Preview for ethereumorg ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2729a48
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/ethereumorg/deploys/65f05b63b7faeb0008a03c5d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-12430--ethereumorg.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1feedc and 2729a48.
Files ignored due to path filters (5)
  • src/intl/en/glossary-tooltip.json is excluded by: !**/*.json
  • src/intl/en/glossary.json is excluded by: !**/*.json
  • src/intl/fr/glossary.json is excluded by: !**/*.json
  • src/intl/hu/glossary.json is excluded by: !**/*.json
  • src/intl/it/glossary.json is excluded by: !**/*.json
Files selected for processing (4)
  • public/content/translations/ca/energy-consumption/index.md (1 hunks)
  • public/content/translations/id/energy-consumption/index.md (1 hunks)
  • public/content/translations/nl/energy-consumption/index.md (1 hunks)
  • public/content/translations/ro/energy-consumption/index.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
public/content/translations/id/energy-consumption/index.md (2)
  • 27-27: The correction of the hyperlink related to a 51% attack in the context of Ethereum's proof of stake (PoS) consensus mechanism is crucial for ensuring that readers have access to accurate and reliable information. This change helps maintain the integrity and accuracy of the document, especially in discussions about security vulnerabilities and consensus mechanisms in blockchain technology.
  • 24-30: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-103]

Overall, the document provides a clear and comprehensive overview of Ethereum's energy consumption, with a focus on the transition from proof of work (PoW) to proof of stake (PoS). The translation appears to be accurate and maintains the integrity of the original content. It's important to ensure that such documents remain up-to-date and continue to reflect the latest developments in Ethereum's roadmap and consensus mechanisms.

public/content/translations/nl/energy-consumption/index.md (2)
  • 27-27: The correction of the hyperlink related to a 51% attack in the context of Ethereum's proof of stake (PoS) versus proof of work (PoW) is crucial for ensuring that readers have access to accurate and reliable information. This change helps maintain the integrity and accuracy of the document, especially in discussions about security vulnerabilities and consensus mechanisms in blockchain technology.
  • 24-30: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-103]

Overall, the document provides a clear and comprehensive overview of Ethereum's energy consumption, with a focus on the transition from proof of work (PoW) to proof of stake (PoS). The translation appears to be accurate and maintains the integrity of the original content. It's important to ensure that such documents remain up-to-date and continue to reflect the latest developments in Ethereum's roadmap and consensus mechanisms.

public/content/translations/ro/energy-consumption/index.md (1)
  • 27-27: The update to the hyperlink for the "51% attack" glossary term is accurate and aligns with the PR's objectives to ensure correct redirection and information access. This correction is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the document, especially given its focus on Ethereum's consensus mechanisms and energy consumption.

However, it's recommended to conduct a thorough review of the entire document to ensure all terminology and hyperlinks are consistent and accurate, given the document's significance in explaining critical aspects of Ethereum's operation and environmental impact.

public/content/translations/ca/energy-consumption/index.md (1)
  • 27-27: The hyperlink correction to the 51% attack scenario is accurate and improves the document's reliability by ensuring readers are directed to the correct information. This change aligns with the PR's objective of updating glossary terms and correcting hyperlinks across translations. The modification is crucial for providing accurate information about potential attack scenarios in Ethereum's PoS mechanism.

@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
"execution-layer-term": "Couche d'exécution",
"execution-layer-definition": "La couche d'exécution d'Ethereum est le réseau des <a href=\"/glossary/#execution-client\">clients d'exécution</a>.",
"eoa-term": "Compte externe (EOA)",
"eoa-definition": "Les comptes détenus en externe (EOA) sont des <a href=\"/glossary/#account\">comptes</a> contrôlés par des <a href=\"/glossary/#private-key\">clés privées</a>, généralement générées à l'aide d'une <a href=\"/glossary/#hd-wallet-seed\">phrase de récupération</a>. Contrairement aux contrats intelligents, les comptes détenus en externe sont des comptes auxquels aucun code n'est associé. En général, ces comptes sont gérés par un <a href=\"/glossary/#wallet\">portefeuille</a>.",
"eoa-definition": "Les comptes détenus en externe (EOA) sont des <a href=\"/glossary/#account\">comptes</a> contrôlés par des <a href=\"/glossary/#private-key\">clés privées</a>, généralement générées à l'aide d'une <a href=\"/glossary/#recovery-phrase\">phrase de récupération</a>. Contrairement aux contrats intelligents, les comptes détenus en externe sont des comptes auxquels aucun code n'est associé. En général, ces comptes sont gérés par un <a href=\"/glossary/#wallet\">portefeuille</a>.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was recovery-phrase added recently? I'm not finding it in the glossary

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see recovery-phrase-term and recovery-phrase-definition in /en/glossary-tooltip.json and /en/glossary.json

Was merged last week #12236, but isnt in production yet.

Copy link
Member

@corwintines corwintines left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@corwintines corwintines merged commit 34138dc into dev Mar 13, 2024
6 checks passed
@corwintines corwintines deleted the fix-terms branch March 13, 2024 06:26
This was referenced Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content 🖋️ This involves copy additions or edits translation 🌍 This is related to our Translation Program
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants