Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend tx_context with EIP-4844 blob hashes #691

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2023
Merged

Extend tx_context with EIP-4844 blob hashes #691

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2023

Conversation

chfast
Copy link
Collaborator

@chfast chfast commented Jun 26, 2023

Extend evmc_tx_context with the reference to the array of blob hashes from EIP-4844.

@chfast chfast requested a review from yperbasis June 26, 2023 09:42
@chfast chfast force-pushed the blob_hashes branch 2 times, most recently from aa02fb9 to cf2ed30 Compare June 26, 2023 10:51
@chfast chfast requested review from axic and gumb0 June 26, 2023 10:55
Extend `evmc_tx_context` with the reference to the array of blob hashes
from EIP-4844.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 26, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #691 (037eb7d) into master (64d36f6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #691   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.18%   93.18%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        3800     3800           
  Branches      394      394           
=======================================
  Hits         3541     3541           
  Misses        147      147           
  Partials      112      112           

@chfast chfast merged commit 1a046a7 into master Jul 7, 2023
20 checks passed
@chfast chfast deleted the blob_hashes branch July 7, 2023 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants