We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a test where we SSTORE the balance of the sender mid-execution when the transaction is a type-3 transaction:
SSTORE
contract_code = Op.SSTORE(0, Op.BALANCE(Op.ORIGIN)) ... tx = Transaction( ty=Spec.BLOB_TX_TYPE, nonce=tx_i, to=contract_address, value=tx_value, gas_limit=tx_gas, data=tx_calldata, max_fee_per_gas=tx_max_fee_per_gas, max_priority_fee_per_gas=tx_max_priority_fee_per_gas, max_fee_per_blob_gas=tx_max_fee_per_blob_gas, access_list=tx_access_list, blob_versioned_hashes=blob_hashes, error=tx_error if tx_i == (len(blob_hashes_per_tx) - 1) else None, )
Test using a similar parametrization to tests/cancun/eip4844_blobs/test_blob_txs.py::test_insufficient_balance_blob_tx.
tests/cancun/eip4844_blobs/test_blob_txs.py::test_insufficient_balance_blob_tx
This is to verify that all clients are subtracting the blob gas from the account before executing the transaction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also add a case where the type-3 sender receives funds mid-execution.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fixed by #407
spencer-tb
No branches or pull requests
Add a test where we
SSTORE
the balance of the sender mid-execution when the transaction is a type-3 transaction:Test using a similar parametrization to
tests/cancun/eip4844_blobs/test_blob_txs.py::test_insufficient_balance_blob_tx
.This is to verify that all clients are subtracting the blob gas from the account before executing the transaction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: