Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Gray Glacier spec #537

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 15, 2022
Merged

Create Gray Glacier spec #537

merged 2 commits into from Jun 15, 2022

Conversation

timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

Specification for the Gray Glacier network upgrade.

Rationale for the block offset chosen in EIP-5133 is available here. Calculations used to choose the block height are available here.

Given the speed of the process relative to usual, I would like to get a +1 from each EL client team before merging, cc: @tkstanczak, @garyschulte, @MariusVanDerWijden, @yperbasis. I will also leave this PR open until 15:00 UTC on Wednesday, June 15.

Signed-off-by: Tim Beiko <t.beiko23@gmail.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #537 (7f9dcd0) into master (dfaaa42) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #537   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.82%   77.82%           
=======================================
  Files         333      333           
  Lines       19243    19243           
=======================================
  Hits        14976    14976           
  Misses       4267     4267           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 77.82% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dfaaa42...7f9dcd0. Read the comment docs.

Copy link

@garyschulte garyschulte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@daniellehrner and I spot checked these numbers and they appear correct. We will incorporate these into besu's gray glacier fork PR, and will update this comment with our calculated fork id.

Copy link
Member

@MariusVanDerWijden MariusVanDerWijden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM

@timbeiko timbeiko merged commit d128061 into master Jun 15, 2022
@ScottyPoi ScottyPoi mentioned this pull request Jun 23, 2022
Copy link

@Dondaada1 Dondaada1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

spam.

@SamWilsn SamWilsn deleted the gray-glacier branch April 10, 2024 23:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants