core: reset txpool on sethead #26392
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MariusVanDerWijden
requested review from
karalabe,
holiman and
rjl493456442
as code owners
shekhirin
pushed a commit
to shekhirin/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2023
This change sends a HeadChainEvent when SetHead is invoked. The txpool will then reset the txnoncer on receiving the event.
MoonShiesty
pushed a commit
to MoonShiesty/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2023
This change sends a HeadChainEvent when SetHead is invoked. The txpool will then reset the txnoncer on receiving the event.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR sends a HeadChainEvent on SetHead. The txpool will reset the txnoncer on receiving this head chain event.
probably closes #26154 & #20078
(The change to the test is because the setHeadTest now modifies the txpool, so the gas cost for creating the accesslist is too low)