api/bind: Add CallOpts.BlockHash to allow calling contracts at a specific block hash #28084
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ajsutton
requested review from
gballet and
MariusVanDerWijden
as code owners
|
@MariusVanDerWijden Mind hitting merge for me? :) |
|
We've discussed this last week. Should be ok, but it creates a strange asymmetric API. Would be nice to add the "AtHash" methods for everything (code, balance, nonce, etc). |
@karalabe Added |
0x366
pushed a commit
to Dexcelerate/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2023
…ific block hash (ethereum#28084) * api/bind: Add CallOpts.BlockHash to allow calling contracts at a specific block hash. * ethclient: Add BalanceAtHash, NonceAtHash and StorageAtHash functions
devopsbo3
pushed a commit
to HorizenOfficial/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2023
…ific block hash (ethereum#28084) * api/bind: Add CallOpts.BlockHash to allow calling contracts at a specific block hash. * ethclient: Add BalanceAtHash, NonceAtHash and StorageAtHash functions
devopsbo3
added a commit
to HorizenOfficial/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2023
…t a specific block hash (ethereum#28084)" This reverts commit 9f7f4a7.
devopsbo3
added a commit
to HorizenOfficial/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2023
…t a specific block hash (ethereum#28084)" This reverts commit 9f7f4a7.
devopsbo3
added a commit
to HorizenOfficial/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2023
…t a specific block hash (ethereum#28084)" This reverts commit 9f7f4a7.
Dergarcon
pushed a commit
to specialmechanisms/mev-geth-0x2mev
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
…ific block hash (ethereum#28084) * api/bind: Add CallOpts.BlockHash to allow calling contracts at a specific block hash. * ethclient: Add BalanceAtHash, NonceAtHash and StorageAtHash functions
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds
BlockHashtoCallOptsso contract bindings can be used to call contracts at a specific block hash. Previously only block number or pending was supported.Backwards compatibility is preserved by introducing a new
BlockHashContractCallerinterface with theCallContractAtHashandCodeAtHashmethods required from the backend, following a similar pattern toPendingContractCaller. Simulated backend is updated to support the new methods andCodeAtHashhas been added toethclient.Client- it already supportedCallContractAtHash.Fixes #28017