-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 460
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Latest 4 solc versions are missed. #10
Comments
@Latrasis as an improvement it would be nice to improve solc-bin by having the versions in a JSON file. solc-bin contains list.txt and list.js for the versions. The latter has two fields: Do you think you could improve the process in solc-bin? That could help solc-js :) |
@axic: Sure thing! Just to understand a bit more, what is the process of adding a new version? Is the |
@Latrasis both are generated by this script |
Can you please explain a bit more why you think this is a bug? |
@chriseth: While the realtime solidity compiler (RSC) fetches the latest version, with the current issue beforehand |
Ok, thanks, now I understand. The "inline library functions" feature is not yet released. It is part of the nightly developer snapshots that are used by browser-solidity. Version 0.3.3 will be released as soon as solidity is stable enough and it will of course contain this new feature. The npm version is created for releases only in order to prevent people from deploying contracts with non-release versions (which are less stable and harder to verify because they might not be as well archived as the released versions). Using The reason why browser-solidity uses development snapshots is because it is trivial to switch back to an older version if something goes wrong. |
Sorry, I'm not too familiar with web development. Just to make sure I'm updating the documentation correctly, if I wanted to use the latest development snapshot, I'd do the following? var solc = require('solc');
var snapshot = solc.loadRemoteVersion('latest'); |
@Denton-L thank you! Answered your question on the PR. |
@chriseth I see, I missed that. But as a suggestion: how about using |
@Latrasis yes, good idea! |
When listing the remote versions the loop misses the last 4 versions in the list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: