Clarify dependency of H on h in BLOCKHASH instruction #298
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jamesray1
suggested changes
Feb 21, 2018
pirapira
force-pushed
the
blockhash-formulation
branch
from
e978551
to
6d98606
Compare
|
Rebased. |
jamesray1
approved these changes
Feb 22, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the description of
BLOCKHASHinstruction, there was a symbolHwhose value was determined in a somewhat implicit way. This PR makes it more explicit thatH(h)is the block header corresponding to its hashh.