ECIP-1052: Reject "Smart-contract Security Auditing core" #231
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This requires the Treasury. Both the Treasury and this Auditing proposal on top run counter to ECIP-1017 monetary policy. Auditing is a good idea, but should not be centralized into the block rewards. This runs counter to ETC philosophy and principles and should be rejected. Perhaps this is raised in an ETC Core Developers call, and formally rejected?
|
Agree to Reject on grounds of centralized system services. Don't want to spend any time on it at any meeting. |
|
Same point I made here: #229 (comment) |
|
Should be raised on a call, yes. |
ghost
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2020
|
I am also rejecting it. |
soc1c
changed the title
YazzyYaz
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This requires the Treasury.
Both the Treasury and this Auditing proposal on top run counter to ECIP-1017 monetary policy.
Auditing is a good idea, but should not be centralized into the block rewards.
This runs counter to ETC philosophy and principles and should be rejected.
Perhaps this is raised in an ETC Core Developers call, and formally rejected?