Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ECBP 1076 "Miner Signaling" with latest options #339

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

q9f
Copy link
Contributor

@q9f q9f commented Aug 17, 2020

Incorporates reviews from #194 and adds RandomX

@q9f q9f added type: std-ecbp ECIPs of the type "ECBP" - describing best practices rather than protocols. status:1 draft ECIP is in draft stage an can be assigned ECIP number and merged, but requires community consensus. editor:5 needs-review This contribution needs a careful review. labels Aug 17, 2020
Copy link
Member

@realcodywburns realcodywburns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me.

@developerkevin
Copy link
Member

Is "miner signaling" non-binding or do we take what is being signaled as bond i.e. miners will decide X or Y and will be added or change implemented?

(Just trying to gain some clarity)

@q9f
Copy link
Contributor Author

q9f commented Aug 26, 2020

This needs some more thoughts. I do not wish to proceed with that currently.

@q9f q9f closed this Aug 26, 2020
@q9f q9f deleted the q9-1076-facelift branch August 26, 2020 10:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editor:5 needs-review This contribution needs a careful review. status:1 draft ECIP is in draft stage an can be assigned ECIP number and merged, but requires community consensus. type: std-ecbp ECIPs of the type "ECBP" - describing best practices rather than protocols.
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants