-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ECIP-1094: Integration of VeriBlock Proof-of-Proof into Ethereum Classic #340
Conversation
Pushing VeriBlock PoP ECIP Draft
Updated ECIP Status to `draft`
Also, could you try to attend the next call? See #333 |
ECIP Number Assigned Co-authored-by: Raw Pong Ghmoa <58883403+q9f@users.noreply.github.com>
Updated title per suggestion Co-authored-by: Raw Pong Ghmoa <58883403+q9f@users.noreply.github.com>
Absolutely, looking forward to discussing further. |
Is there anywhere I can learn how this works? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good to me
There is a lot more detail located here: https://www.veriblock.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Proof-of-Proof_and_VeriBlock_Blockchain_Protocol_Consensus_Algorithm_and_Economic_Incentivization_v1.0.pdf Do you have any particular questions about Proof-of-Proof? |
Can you change the filename to |
Co-authored-by: Raw Pong Ghmoa <58883403+q9f@users.noreply.github.com>
@q9f Moved and renamed the spec and it's correlating assets, and added a valid discussions link to a new issue. Let me know if there are any other formatting changes needed. |
This ECIP proposes the integration of VeriBlock PoP security to protect Ethereum Classic from long-range 51% reorganizations and 51% attack censorship attacks against smart contract protocols.