Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Issue with sv_protect [1/2] on Windows 7 #728

Closed
ETLegacyTeam opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Issue with sv_protect [1/2] on Windows 7 #728

ETLegacyTeam opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
🐞 Bug Something isn't working ❌ Invalid This doesn't seem right P3: Normal Priority 3
Milestone
2.71

Comments

@ETLegacyTeam
Copy link
Member

ETLegacyTeam commented Mar 5, 2020 •
edited

Author: @rafal1137 (RaFaL)
Date: 2014-12-15
Redmine Issue: 728, https://dev.etlegacy.com/issues/728

It keep spamming server console or normal one depends which way you are hosting a server with this

/sv_protect 1
SVC_Status: rate limit from 178.32.41.213:2980 exceeded, dropping request
SVC_Status: rate limit from 178.32.41.213:2980 exceeded, dropping request
SVC_Status: rate limit from 178.32.41.213:2980 exceeded, dropping request
SVC_Status: rate limit from 178.32.41.213:2980 exceeded, dropping request
SVC_Status: rate limit from 178.32.41.213:2980 exceeded, dropping request
SVC_Status: rate limit from 178.32.41.213:2980 exceeded, dropping request
SVC_Status: rate limit from 178.32.41.213:2980 exceeded, dropping request
....
]\sv_protect 2
Possible DRDoS attack to address 178.32.41.213:2980, ignoring getinfo/getstatus connectionless packet
Possible DRDoS attack to address 178.32.41.213:2980, ignoring getinfo/getstatus connectionless packet
Possible DRDoS attack to address 178.32.41.213:2980, ignoring getinfo/getstatus connectionless packet
Possible DRDoS attack to address 178.32.41.213:2980, ignoring getinfo/getstatus connectionless packet
Possible DRDoS attack to address 178.32.41.213:2980, ignoring getinfo/getstatus connectionless packet
...

Related issue(s): #541
@ETLegacyTeam ETLegacyTeam added 🐞 Bug Something isn't working ❌ Invalid This doesn't seem right P3: Normal Priority 3 labels Mar 5, 2020
@ETLegacyTeam ETLegacyTeam added this to the 2.71 milestone Mar 5, 2020
@ETLegacyTeam
Copy link
Member Author

From: @saukko28 (Saukko)
Date: 2014-12-16T13:46:41Z

Can't reproduce. Possibly Windows 7 related issue again?

-*S

@ETLegacyTeam
Copy link
Member Author

From: @rmarquis (Spyhawk)
Date: 2014-12-16T19:16:29Z

Cannot reproduce either on Win7.

@ETLegacyTeam
Copy link
Member Author

From: @IR4T4 (IR4T4)
Date: 2014-12-16T20:07:01Z

Toggling both ways at runtime might cause side effects. sv_protect should be latched,

@ETLegacyTeam
Copy link
Member Author

From: @rafal1137 (RaFaL)
Date: 2014-12-17T16:25:00Z

Attack on my router caused it

@ETLegacyTeam
Copy link
Member Author

From: @JanSimek (Radegast)
Date: 2014-12-17T16:34:01Z

sv_protect is indeed broken. See #541

@ETLegacyTeam
Copy link
Member Author

From: @IR4T4 (IR4T4)
Date: 2014-12-17T16:39:39Z

In this case sv_protect did a good job. See affected port.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🐞 Bug Something isn't working ❌ Invalid This doesn't seem right P3: Normal Priority 3
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.71
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ETLegacyTeam