Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Requesting Support for Conda Packaging #106

Closed
munechika-koyo opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Requesting Support for Conda Packaging #106

munechika-koyo opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@munechika-koyo
Copy link

Hi,

As discussed at #83 and #103, we should allow users to install calcam with conda.
Especially, we need to distribute it through conda-forge channel, and understand how to conduct it.

@ssilburn
Copy link
Collaborator

(previous message deleted due to new developments)

I think I've now got a working conda build recipe included. I'll add a GitHub action for building & publishing the anaconda package at the next release, not through conda-forge at first but at least through a public channel.

@munechika-koyo
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your updates!
I will still wait for conda-forge support!

@ssilburn
Copy link
Collaborator

OK, 2.12 released and is available on Anaconda.org; install instructions added to the Calcam documentation. Appears to be working correctly; I'll close this issue now.

@munechika-koyo
Copy link
Author

Thank you for making calcam available on Anaconda.org, which may be the default channel on conda.
However, is conda-forge compatibility out of scoop?
This is because it cannot be found when one uses Miniforge which limits only conda-forge channel.
So, I would appreciate it if you would handle this issue in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants