inline certain no-op function calls #1898
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This release makes esbuild inline two types of no-op functions: empty functions and identity functions. These most commonly arise when most of the function body is eliminated as dead code. In the examples below, this happens because we use
--define:window.DEBUG=false
to cause dead code elimination inside the function body of the resultingif (false)
statement. This inlining is a small code size and performance win but, more importantly, it allows for people to use these features to add useful abstractions that improve the development experience without needing to worry about the run-time performance impact.An identity function is a function that just returns its argument. Here's an example of inlining an identity function:
An empty function is a function with an empty body. Here's an example of inlining an empty function:
To get this behavior you'll need to use the
function
keyword to define your function since that causes the definition to be hoisted, which eliminates concerns around initialization order. These features also work across modules, so functions are still inlined even if the definition of the function is in a separate module from the call to the function. To get cross-module function inlining to work, you'll need to have bundling enabled and use theimport
andexport
keywords to access the function so that esbuild can see which functions are called. And all of this has been added without an observable impact to compile times.I previously wasn't able to add this to esbuild easily because of esbuild's low-pass compilation approach. The compiler only does three full passes over the data for speed. The passes are roughly for parsing, binding, and printing. It's only possible to inline something after binding but it needs to be inlined before printing. Also the way module linking was done made it difficult to roll back uses of symbols that were inlined, so the symbol definitions were not tree shaken even when they became unused due to inlining.
The linking issue was somewhat resolved when I fixed #128 in the previous release. To implement cross-module inlining of TypeScript enums, I came up with a hack to defer certain symbol uses until the linking phase, which happens after binding but before printing. Another hack is that inlining of TypeScript enums is done directly in the printer to avoid needing another pass.
The possibility of these two hacks has unblocked these simple function inlining use cases that are now handled. This isn't a fully general approach because optimal inlining is recursive. Inlining something may open up further inlining opportunities, which either requires multiple iterations or a worklist algorithm, both of which don't work when doing late-stage inlining in the printer. But the function inlining that esbuild now implements is still useful even though it's one level deep, and so I believe it's still worth adding.
Fixes #290
Fixes #907