New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: Feature parity in ANSI markup #683
Labels
feature-request
A suggestion for new functionality.
Comments
Kelketek
changed the title
Feature Request: <descriptive title here>
Feature Request: Feature parity in ANSI markup
Mar 2, 2015
Griatch
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2015
…eatures of %c-type commands (highlightability) available also to {-type commands. See #683.
The {- syntax is up to snuff with %c style now. |
@Griatch Should this issue be closed, then? Or are you counting the final deprecation of |
I was thinking to close this once %-style goes away. It's strictly not what this issue is about, admittedly. |
Griatch
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2015
1.5 years of deprecation should be enough. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description of the suggested feature and how it is supposed to work for the admin/end user:
Implement remaining ANSI codes for
{
syntax that currently only%
style syntax supportsA list of arguments for why you think this new feature should be included in Evennia:
%
does%
needs to go away before the PyPi release, as it violates the principle of "There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it."The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: