New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wish list: standard icons for upper level ECO terms #164
Comments
How small do you need these to be? Simple like font-awesome style? Also, when you say 2 icons, do you mean two images, each with a cross out for their opposites? |
Maybe "experimental or non-experimental" could be rephrased as in vitro, in
vivo and in silico?
…On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Julie McMurry ***@***.***> wrote:
How small do you need these to be? Simple like font-awesome style? Also,
when you say 2 icons, do you mean two images, each with a cross out for
their opposites?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#164 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA9lqSkzkHfVH7eeu5M3C9M0MvvV5WDLks5tcNuLgaJpZM4SiCbZ>
.
|
Hey again! We are going to have some top-level graphics made for the upper-level classes and use |
We've decided not to proceed on this for now. |
It might be worth having a decomposition of ECO classes into sets of icons.
For GO and many projects, there are a few properties that people care about: experimental or non-experimental, manual or automated. This could be represented by 2 icons. We might want to expand with an additional icon representing the method - e.g. a tree for IBA.
Other groups may have other requirements.
cc @jmcmurry
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: